Followers

Monday, August 24, 2015

Financial Planning Issues for New Parents


Financial Planning Issues for New Parents
Presented by Jared Daniel of Wealth Guardian Group

What is it?

As you prepare for life with your new child, it's time to prepare a new financial plan for your family or make any necessary changes to your existing plan. You'll want to consider how your baby will affect your budget, make sure you have adequate insurance, protect your child's future with a well-thought-out estate plan, and determine how having a child will affect your income taxes.


Budgeting for baby


Develop a new spending plan

The birth of a child is an opportunity for you to set up a new budget or review an existing one. You'll have to consider the impact that your child will have on your living expenses as well as account for any shift in income that might occur if you decide to quit your job. You'll also need to save more money to ensure that your family has money to meet its future needs.


Expenses that typically increase when you have a baby

·         Your grocery bill: Diapers and formula (you may use some even if you're breast-feeding) are very expensive. Later, when your baby turns to solid food, you'll have to figure in the cost of baby food.
·         Your housing costs: If you don't already live in a house or large apartment, you may find yourself moving once your baby gets old enough to take up a lot of space with toys and equipment.
·         Your transportation costs: If you have a small car or a two-seat convertible, you may find it difficult to fit in a car seat, and you may need to buy a new car. Or, if you have an old car, you may want to buy something more reliable now that you have to worry about your baby's safety.
·         Your clothing and household expenses: You'll find yourself spending less on yourself and more on your child now that your budget has to stretch. You'll spend a lot initially to buy essentials for your child and then spend a bit more each month than you're used to for items your child needs.
·         Medical expenses: You'll probably pay a co-payment for each of these trips unless your health insurance plan covers 100 percent of well-baby care. Your health insurance premium will likely dramatically increase as well, unless you already had family coverage for you and your spouse.
·         Cost of child care: Whether you look for full-time day care or hire an occasional baby-sitter, you need to plan for the impact this will have on your budget.


Initial expenses

The initial outlay for your baby can be quite high. You'll have to equip your home with baby furniture, a stroller, a high chair, an infant seat, a car seat, bedding, and clothing, among other items. You could spend well over $1,000 equipping your home with just the basics, and many new parents spend a lot more.

However, when you're shopping for the baby you're expecting, try to separate emotion from need. Of course, you want your baby to have the best, but you don't really need the best in most cases. Your baby won't look any cuter in an expensive crib, and many parents can tell stories about the top-of-the-line stroller they purchased and then found was too heavy to push easily. The best way to proceed is to ask other parents for recommendations, then shop around. Usually, you don't have to sacrifice quality and safety to save money. If you start shopping far enough ahead, you can find good deals in discount stores, department stores, and superstores. You can also look for items in thrift stores, consignment shops, and yard sales, although finding clean secondhand items in good condition can be a challenge. Ask friends and relatives, too, if you can borrow baby items that they're not currently using. If your friends are throwing you a shower, ask for items you need.

Tip:     Don't buy more than you initially need for your baby, because you may find that what you thought you needed, you really don't. In addition, your friends and relatives may shower you with gifts once the baby is born, and you won't need to buy as much as you thought you would. In particular, don't go overboard buying clothes until you can gauge how rapidly your baby will grow. One thing you definitely should buy is a car seat. Many hospitals won't let you leave without having one, although they may loan you one temporarily.


Costs of day care

The cost of day care will depend on where you live, how many children you have in day care, how old your children are, and what type of child care you choose.


Saving for education

It's wise to begin saving for your child's education as early as possible. There are several ways to do this. You can begin by depositing a certain amount every month into a savings or money market account, contribute to a college savings account, purchase Series EE bonds (may be called Patriot bonds), or take advantage of a wide variety of other investment vehicles.


Saving for emergencies

If you don't have an emergency fund, now is the time to set one up. If your child gets sick, your car breaks down, you need to move unexpectedly, or you lose your job, you can dip into your emergency account. An emergency account should normally contain an amount that equals three to six months' worth of living expenses.


Estate planning issues

Estate planning is a subject many parents would like to avoid. After all, you're celebrating new life, and it's sad to think that you may not be around to raise your child. However, it's crucial to the welfare of your child that you leave behind instructions that clarify your wishes in the unlikely event that you die before your child grows up. If you don't currently have a will, now is the time for you (and your partner, if any) to draw one up. If you do have a will, you'll need to review it. You'll want to nominate a guardian for your child and decide how you want your assets distributed. You may also consider setting up a trust to protect your child's interests after your death. You should also review your beneficiary designations.


Wills

Each parent should have a will to ensure smooth distribution of his or her estate. After your child is born, you should review your will (or draw up a will if you don't already have one) to make sure that your assets are distributed as you would like, to nominate a guardian for your child, and to choose an executor for your estate.

Tip:     You may want to write a letter to your child that will be your testament (i.e., a message from you that your child can read at a future date). It can be about anything--your philosophy on life, the family history, or some advice that you'd like to give your child. You can attach a copy to your will or put it in with your important records for safekeeping.

Example(s):   When her daughter Sara was born, Emily wrote a letter to her that described the night Sara was born and Emily's hopes and dreams for Sara's future. When Emily was killed in a car accident the year Sara turned 16, Sara read the letter and found out that her mother was proud of her and really wanted her to attend college. So Sara worked hard the next two years of school so that she could get into the local university.


Nominating a guardian

Choosing a guardian for your child is very important. If you die without naming a guardian for your child, it will be up to the court to do it for you, and the person whom the judge names may not be the person you would have chosen to look out for your child. When choosing a guardian, look for someone who will look out for the best interests of your child, preferably someone who has the time and energy to meet the demands of raising a child. Make sure that you ask a potential guardian whether he or she would like to serve as your child's guardian. Often someone you think is the perfect choice really doesn't want the responsibility. For this reason, you should also nominate a contingent guardian.

Periodically rethink your choice of guardian. As your children grow older, you can ask them whom they would like to live with in the event you die. Although this can be a scary subject for children, it's important to raise the issue with them. In addition, once your children are old enough, tell them whom their guardian will be in the event you die.


Setting up a trust

Setting up a trust can be a good way of passing your assets along to your child. A trust document lists how you want any money left to your children spent, and it can ensure that your child's money is protected. A trust can help the guardian manage assets and make sure that estate funds are used to benefit your children according to your wishes.


Insurance issues

Before your child is born, review your insurance coverage to make sure that you and your family are adequately protected. If you or your spouse is going to quit your job(s), you may cut off your life, disability, or health insurance benefits from that job, and you'll need to buy more coverage.


Life insurance

Having a child will increase your need for life insurance coverage. Many experts recommend that you have life insurance equal to five times your annual salary.


Health insurance

The best time to check your maternity coverage is before you become pregnant. Make sure that you understand your deductibles, your co-payments (if any), and whether your policy covers testing, emergency care, and all the costs of delivery (including anesthesia, if necessary). Find out about claims-handling procedures, how long you will be able to stay in the hospital once you've been admitted for delivery, and whether your choice of doctors is limited. Usually, your baby will be covered from the time of birth, but check your insurance policy anyway to make sure. If both you and your partner are covered by or eligible for coverage under an employer-sponsored policy, you may need to decide which policy offers the best (or most cost-effective) family coverage.


Disability insurance

Before you had a child, you may not have worried about becoming disabled. Now that you're planning to have a child, you may be thinking about what would happen if you suffered an injury or illness and couldn't work for days, months, or even years. If you're married, you may be able to rely on your spouse for income, but could your spouse really support all of you?

Example(s):   Bob worked as an accountant, a relatively nonhazardous occupation. However, on Christmas Eve, he broke both wrists when he slipped and fell on a patch of ice. Since his injury was not work-related, he wasn't eligible to receive workers' compensation insurance. In addition, he wasn't covered by an individual or group disability policy. His wife was working full-time as a seamstress but wasn't able to support Bob and their children on her salary alone. Within a few weeks, they were financially destitute.

To protect your family in case your income is cut off due to disability, consider purchasing disability insurance if you don't already have it. You may have a group disability policy through your employer or you may want to purchase an individual disability insurance policy. A disability policy won't replace your total income, but it will likely replace 50 to 70 percent of your earnings.


Income tax considerations

At tax time, you'll find out that some financial benefits can help defray the cost of raising a child. You'll suddenly be eligible for an extra exemption, and you may be eligible for one or more tax credits.


Exemptions

When you file your income tax return, you may be able to claim an exemption for you, your spouse, and your dependents if your adjusted gross income is below a certain phaseout amount. This means that when you file your income tax return in the year of your child's birth (and ensuing years), you'll be able to claim an extra exemption that will reduce your tax liability.


Tax credits

Having a child might enable you to qualify for one or more tax credits. Credits related to children are the child and dependent care tax credit (if you have qualifying child-care expenses), the child tax credit, and the earned income credit (if you have income under a certain level, having a child raises the amount of income you can have and still claim the credit).

Jared Daniel may be reached at www.WealthGuardianGroup.com or our Facebook page.


IMPORTANT DISCLOSURESBroadridge Investor Communication Solutions, Inc. does not provide investment, tax, or legal advice. The information presented here is not specific to any individual's personal circumstances.To the extent that this material concerns tax matters, it is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed by law.  Each taxpayer should seek independent advice from a tax professional based on his or her individual circumstances.These materials are provided for general information and educational purposes based upon publicly available information from sources believed to be reliable—we cannot assure the accuracy or completeness of these materials.  The information in these materials may change at any time and without notice.

Monday, August 17, 2015

Maximizing Your Pension with Life Insurance

Maximizing Your Pension with Life Insurance
Presented by Jared Daniel of Wealth Guardian Group

Introduction

If you participate in a traditional pension plan (known as a defined benefit plan) with your employer, you may receive monthly benefits from the plan after you retire. These benefits are generally based on your age at retirement, as well as your years of service and your average earnings with the company. Depending on your plan's provisions, you may have more than one payout option to choose from. You want to select an option that will provide you with sufficient retirement income. In addition, if you are married, you want to be sure that your spouse will have sufficient income in the event that he or she outlives you.

When you retire, a defined benefit plan must offer you and your spouse a joint and survivor annuity. If your spouse consents in writing, you can generally decline the joint and survivor annuity and elect a single-life annuity instead. Some defined contribution plans offer similar options, so consult your plan administrator or benefits department if you participate in one of these plans.

With a joint and survivor annuity, payments continue as long as either you or your spouse is alive. When one spouse dies, the benefits paid to the surviving spouse generally cannot be less than 50 percent (or more than 100 percent) of the joint benefits. By contrast, with a single-life annuity, payments last for your lifetime and cease upon your death. For example, if you received one payment after retirement and then died, the single-life annuity would provide no further payments from your pension. Your spouse would receive nothing.  

So why would you choose a single-life annuity knowing that payments will stop at your death? One reason is that the single-life annuity generally pays a larger monthly benefit than the joint and survivor annuity. This is because the payments are designed to last for a smaller number of years (i.e., one life expectancy instead of two). Retirees who want to maximize their monthly income sometimes choose the single-life annuity for this reason. The retiree can then use the additional income to purchase life insurance with his or her spouse as the beneficiary, thereby protecting the spouse's financial future. This strategy, commonly called pension "maximization" using life insurance, may be appropriate for you.

Caution:         Be sure to seek qualified professional advice, since choosing a pension payout option and life insurance coverage can be complex and will impact both your financial future and your spouse's.


Factors to consider


Difference in benefits between the two payout options

As mentioned, a single-life annuity pays larger monthly retirement benefits than a joint and survivor annuity. The amount of the difference is a key factor when deciding between the two payout options. This information is generally provided to you prior to distribution as part of the spousal consent/waiver process. If the single-life annuity pays significantly more than the joint and survivor annuity, then electing the single-life annuity along with the purchase of a life insurance policy may be a viable strategy. The larger the monthly benefits under the single-life annuity, the more income you will have to pay the premiums for the life insurance policy. However, if the difference between the two payout options is relatively small, it may be better to elect the joint and survivor annuity. This is especially true if the single-life annuity will not provide enough income to pay the insurance premiums.

Tip:     Always consider the impact of federal and other income taxes on annuity payments when determining the net amount of benefits available for you (and your spouse).


Insurability and cost of insurance

If you are not insurable because of your health and/or other reasons, then electing the single-life annuity along with the purchase of a life insurance policy is not an option. If you are insurable, determine how much life insurance coverage would be needed to compensate your spouse for the loss of your pension income if you elected the single-life annuity. Then look at the cost of that amount of coverage, and compare it with your monthly income from the single-life annuity. This will help you decide if using the pension maximization strategy makes financial sense. If you are relatively young and in good health, the insurance premiums may be much more affordable than if you are older and/or in poor health. However, as the cost of the insurance becomes more expensive, using life insurance to maximize your pension payout becomes less attractive.  


Cost-of-living adjustment

Some pension plans have a cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) feature that allows the monthly benefits to be periodically increased to keep pace with the rate of inflation. If your pension contains this feature, you may need to consider a larger insurance policy to protect your surviving spouse from the loss of your pension income (assuming you elect the single-life annuity). This is because your surviving spouse would receive an ever-increasing amount of annual income over his or her lifetime if you elected the joint and survivor annuity with a COLA feature, and the rate of inflation goes up over time. Thus, the presence of a COLA clause in your pension plan may be a factor against using life insurance to maximize your pension. You will have to work through the numbers to see if it makes more sense to elect the single-life annuity and buy an insurance policy, or to simply elect the joint and survivor annuity.  


Health and life expectancy of your spouse

If your spouse is in poor health or has a short life expectancy, then selecting the single-life annuity along with the purchase of a life insurance policy often makes more sense than selecting the joint and survivor annuity. This strategy is more practical if your spouse is more likely to die before you. As the plan participant and the surviving spouse, you will then have the benefit of the higher monthly payout from the single-life annuity for the rest of your life. You can then choose to discontinue the life insurance policy, or continue to make the premium payments and name a new beneficiary (as long as an irrevocable designation of beneficiary has not been made).  


Age difference between you and your spouse

If there is a large difference between your age and your spouse's age (with you being much older), then opting for the single-life annuity along with the purchase of a life insurance policy may make more sense because the difference in benefits between the single-life annuity and the joint and survivor annuity will typically be greater. If your spouse is considerably younger than you, his or her longer life expectancy will be factored into the calculation of the joint and survivor annuity benefits, resulting in smaller monthly payments. This could leave you and/or your spouse without sufficient retirement income using a joint and survivor annuity. However, if you select a single-life annuity that ends because you die soon after retiring, your much-younger spouse may have to survive financially without the benefit of your pension for a long period of time.  


Gender of the plan participant

If you (the plan participant) are female and insurable at an affordable cost, then selecting the single-life annuity along with the purchase of a life insurance policy may make more sense than selecting the joint and survivor annuity. The reason: All other factors being equal, women are statistically more likely to outlive men of the same age. You will benefit from the higher monthly payout under the single-life annuity while you are alive, and the life insurance coverage will protect your spouse in the event that you die first. By contrast, if you select the joint and survivor annuity and your spouse dies first, you may be stuck with a smaller payout for the rest of your life (unless the plan has a "pop-up" provision--see below).


"Pop-up" provision

Some pension plans offer their participants a "pop-up" provision specifying that if they initially select a joint and survivor annuity payout and the spouse dies first, they can then retroactively select a single-life annuity payout. This gives you flexibility to adapt if things do not go as planned. If your pension plan offers this option, you may not want to select a single-life annuity with the purchase of a life insurance policy. It may be better to initially select the joint and survivor annuity.


Advantages of maximizing your pension with life insurance


It may increase your retirement income

Most people who use a single-life annuity with life insurance to maximize their pension payouts are trying to increase their income during their retirement years. Under most pension plans (and depending on various factors such as the age of the two spouses), a single-life annuity will pay out substantially more per month than a joint and survivor annuity. Most people would like to have that extra income during their retirement years. However, most people are also concerned about providing for their spouses if they should die first. By selecting a single-life annuity along with the purchase of a life insurance policy on the participant's life, some couples can increase their income during retirement and provide for the surviving spouse's financial future.  


It may work well even if the nonparticipant spouse dies first

Using life insurance to maximize your pension payout will work well financially if your nonparticipant spouse should die first. In fact, this strategy may actually produce greater financial benefits if your nonparticipant spouse does die first, because you (the surviving spouse) will receive the higher single-life annuity payout for the rest of your life. You can then either discontinue the insurance policy or name a new beneficiary and continue to pay the premiums.


It may provide assets for your heirs and beneficiaries

Another benefit to selecting the single-life annuity with the purchase of a life insurance policy is that there may be assets left over for your heirs and beneficiaries. If you and your spouse select a joint and survivor annuity, no benefits from your pension plan will be paid to your heirs and beneficiaries (e.g., your children) when the surviving spouse finally dies. If, however, you select a single-life annuity and purchase a life insurance policy on your life, some of the insurance proceeds may still be left for your heirs and beneficiaries after the death of your surviving spouse. This is especially true if your surviving spouse invests the proceeds wisely and does not spend them rapidly, or if your spouse predeceases you and the life insurance proceeds are paid to your beneficiaries upon your death.


Disadvantages of maximizing your pension with life insurance


The income earned on the insurance proceeds may not meet expectations

This strategy may not work well if, for some reason, the investment earnings on the insurance proceeds are too low to adequately provide for the surviving spouse. To illustrate, consider the following hypothetical scenario.

Example(s):   Upon your retirement, you select a single-life annuity for your pension and purchase a $300,000 life insurance policy on your life with your spouse as beneficiary. Based on market conditions at the time of your retirement, you believe that the earnings generated by the insurance proceeds will provide sufficient income for the rest of your spouse's life if you die first. You die three years later, when market conditions have deteriorated substantially. The life insurance proceeds may now not provide enough income for your surviving spouse.  


Your surviving spouse may squander the insurance proceeds

Another potential problem with this strategy is that your surviving spouse may make poor investments with the insurance proceeds, spend them too quickly, or otherwise squander the money. If this happens, your surviving spouse may be in a difficult financial situation for the remainder of his or her lifetime. With the joint and survivor annuity, you minimize this risk because your surviving spouse would at least be assured of receiving the designated pension payout each year.  


The life insurance policy may lapse

If you choose to maximize your pension with life insurance and then stop paying the insurance premiums due to financial problems or other reasons, the insurance policy may lapse. With no insurance proceeds and no pension benefits, your surviving spouse may be in a difficult financial position after your death. In this case, your surviving spouse would have been in a much better position if the two of you had selected the joint and survivor annuity for your pension.  


When this strategy makes sense: a short case study

Example(s):   Assume you are about to retire at age 65, and your spouse is age 62. Your pension plan gives you the option of either a single-life annuity or a joint and survivor annuity. If you select the single-life annuity, you will receive $4,500 per month for the rest of your life, but your spouse will receive nothing if you die first. If you select the joint and survivor annuity, you and/or your spouse will receive $3,000 per month as long at least one of you is alive. That's an additional $1,500 per month (or $18,000 per year) with the single-life annuity.

That sounds attractive, but what will happen to your spouse if you select the single-life annuity and you die before your spouse? Your spouse gets no survivor benefit. Your spouse may need a way of replacing that lost pension income. One way to accomplish this may be to purchase a life insurance policy on your life, and name your spouse as the beneficiary of the policy.

You need to determine whether the extra $1,500 per month under the single-life annuity (less income taxes) will buy enough insurance coverage to produce a replacement income of $3,000 per month if you die before your spouse. That is the amount of income your spouse would have received had you selected the joint and survivor annuity. You also need to determine whether your spouse will live off of only the income from the insurance proceeds, or need to dip into principal as well. You must run the numbers to see what is affordable and what makes financial sense.


Income tax considerations

The monthly retirement benefits you and your spouse receive from your pension are generally treated as taxable income, subject to federal (and possibly state and local) income tax. This is true regardless of whether you elect a single-life annuity payout or a joint and survivor annuity payout. However, since the pension benefits are larger with a single-life annuity, electing this payout option will increase your taxable income during retirement.

If you elect the joint and survivor annuity payout, when the first spouse dies, the pension payout to the survivor will be included in the survivor's taxable income. If you instead use the pension maximization strategy and die before your spouse, the life insurance death benefits will not be included in your surviving spouse's taxable income. This is because life insurance death benefits generally pass free from income tax to the beneficiary of the policy. Of course, your surviving spouse may invest the insurance proceeds in taxable investments. Any earnings from such investments (e.g., interest, dividends, and capital gains) will generally be included in your spouse's taxable income.

Caution:         While life insurance proceeds are generally free from income tax to the beneficiary, estate taxes are another matter. If this is a concern, you should consult a qualified estate planning attorney for appropriate strategies.


Jared Daniel may be reached at www.WealthGuardianGroup.com or our Facebook page.
IMPORTANT DISCLOSURESBroadridge Investor Communication Solutions, Inc. does not provide investment, tax, or legal advice. The information presented here is not specific to any individual's personal circumstances.To the extent that this material concerns tax matters, it is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed by law.  Each taxpayer should seek independent advice from a tax professional based on his or her individual circumstances.These materials are provided for general information and educational purposes based upon publicly available information from sources believed to be reliable—we cannot assure the accuracy or completeness of these materials.  The information in these materials may change at any time and without notice.

Monday, August 10, 2015

Evaluating an Early Retirement Offer

Evaluating an Early Retirement Offer
Presented by Jared Daniel of Wealth Guardian Group

In today's corporate environment, cost cutting, restructuring, and downsizing are the norm, and many employers are offering their employees early retirement packages. But how do you know if the seemingly attractive offer you've received is a good one? By evaluating it carefully to make sure that the offer fits your needs.


What's the severance package?

Most early retirement offers include a severance package that is based on your annual salary and years of service at the company. For example, your employer might offer you one or two weeks' salary (or even a month's salary) for each year of service. Make sure that the severance package will be enough for you to make the transition to the next phase of your life. Also, make sure that you understand the payout options available to you. You may be able to take a lump-sum severance payment and then invest the money to provide income, or use it to meet large expenses. Or, you may be able to take deferred payments over several years to spread out your income tax bill on the money.


How does all of this affect your pension?

If your employer has a traditional pension plan, the retirement benefits you receive from the plan are based on your age, years of service, and annual salary. You typically must work until your company's normal retirement age (usually 65) to receive the maximum benefits. This means that you may receive smaller benefits if you accept an offer to retire early. The difference between this reduced pension and a full pension could be large, because pension benefits typically accrue faster as you near retirement. However, your employer may provide you with larger pension benefits until you can start collecting Social Security at age 62. Or, your employer might boost your pension benefits by adding years to your age, length of service, or both. These types of pension sweeteners are key features to look for in your employer's offer--especially if a reduced pension won't give you enough income.


Does the offer include health insurance?

Does your employer's early retirement offer include medical coverage for you and your family? If not, look at your other health insurance options, such as COBRA, a private policy, or dependent coverage through your spouse's employer-sponsored plan. Because your health-care costs will probably increase as you age, an offer with no medical coverage may not be worth taking if these other options are unavailable or too expensive. Even if the offer does include medical coverage, make sure that you understand and evaluate the coverage. Will you be covered for life, or at least until you're eligible for Medicare? Is the coverage adequate and affordable (some employers may cut benefits or raise premiums for early retirees)? If your employer's coverage doesn't meet your health insurance needs, you may be able to fill the gaps with other insurance.


What other benefits are available?

Some early retirement offers include employer-sponsored life insurance. This can help you meet your life insurance needs, and the coverage probably won't cost you much (if anything). However, continued employer coverage is usually limited (e.g., one year's coverage equal to your annual salary) or may not be offered at all. This may not be a problem if you already have enough life insurance elsewhere, or if you're financially secure and don't need life insurance. Otherwise, weigh your needs against the cost of buying an individual policy. You may also be able to convert some of your old employer coverage to an individual policy, though your premium will be higher than when you were employed.

In addition, a good early retirement offer may include other perks. Your employer may provide you and other early retirees with financial planning assistance. This can come in handy if you feel overwhelmed by all of the financial issues that early retirement brings. Your employer may also offer job placement assistance to help you find other employment. If you have company stock options, your employer may give you more time to exercise them. Other benefits, such as educational assistance, may also be available. Check with your employer to find out exactly what its offer includes.


Can you afford to retire early?

To decide if you should accept an early retirement offer, you can't just look at the offer itself. You have to consider your total financial picture. Can you afford to retire early? Even if you can, will you still be able to reach all of your retirement goals? These are tough questions that a financial professional should help you sort out, but you can take some basic steps yourself.

Identify your sources of retirement income and the yearly amount you can expect from each source. Then, estimate your annual retirement expenses (don't forget taxes and inflation) and make sure your income will be more than enough to meet them. You may find that you can accept your employer's offer and probably still have the retirement lifestyle you want. But remember, these are only estimates. Build in a comfortable cushion in case your expenses increase, your income drops, or you live longer than expected.

If you don't think you can afford early retirement, it may be better not to accept your employer's offer. The longer you stay in the workforce, the shorter your retirement will be and the less money you'll need to fund it. Working longer may also allow you to build larger savings in your IRAs, retirement plans, and investments. However, if you really want to retire early, making some smart choices may help you overcome the obstacles. Try to lower or eliminate some of your retirement expenses. Consider a more aggressive approach to investing. Take a part-time job for extra income. Finally, think about electing early Social Security benefits at age 62, but remember that your monthly benefit will be smaller if you do this.


What if you can't afford to retire? Finding a new job


You may find yourself having to accept an early retirement offer, even though you can't afford to retire. One way to make up for the difference between what you receive from your early retirement package and your old paycheck is to find a new job, but that doesn't mean that you have to abandon your former line of work for a new career. You can start by finding out if your former employer would hire you as a consultant. Or, you may find that you would like to turn what was once just a hobby into a second career. Then there is always the possibility of finding full-time or part-time employment with a new company.

However, for the employee who has 20 years of service with the same company, the prospect of job hunting may be terrifying. If you have been out of the job market for a long time, you might not feel comfortable or have experience marketing yourself for a new job. Some companies provide career counseling to assist employees in re-entering the workforce. If your company does not provide you with this service, you may want to look into corporate outplacement firms and nonprofit organizations in your area that deal with career transition.

Note: Many early retirement offers contain noncompetition agreements or offer monetary inducements on the condition that you agree not to work for a competitor. However, you'll generally be able to work for a new employer and still receive your pension and other retirement plan benefits.


What will happen if you say no?

If you refuse early retirement, you may continue to thrive with your employer. You could earn promotions and salary raises that boost your pension. You could receive a second early retirement offer that's better than the first one. But, you may not be so lucky.  Consider whether your position could be eliminated down the road.

If the consequences of saying no are hard to predict, use your best judgment and seek professional advice. But don't take too long. You may have only a short window of time, typically 60 to 90 days, to make your decision.

Jared Daniel may be reached at www.WealthGuardianGroup.com or our Facebook page.


IMPORTANT DISCLOSURESBroadridge Investor Communication Solutions, Inc. does not provide investment, tax, or legal advice. The information presented here is not specific to any individual's personal circumstances.To the extent that this material concerns tax matters, it is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed by law.  Each taxpayer should seek independent advice from a tax professional based on his or her individual circumstances.These materials are provided for general information and educational purposes based upon publicly available information from sources believed to be reliable—we cannot assure the accuracy or completeness of these materials.  The information in these materials may change at any time and without notice.

Monday, August 3, 2015

Retirement Income: IRAs

Retirement Income: IRAs
Presented by Jared Daniel of Wealth Guardian Group

In general

If you're like most people, individual retirement accounts and individual retirement annuities (IRAs) comprise a significant portion of your retirement nest egg. It's important to understand when you can (and must) begin taking distributions from your IRAs, the tax consequences, and how to incorporate your withdrawals into your retirement income plan.

Caution:         Although most states follow the federal income tax treatment of traditional or Roth IRAs, some do not. You should check with your tax advisor regarding the tax treatment of IRAs in your particular state.


Distributions from traditional IRAs: Prior to age 59½


The purpose of IRAs is to provide income to help fund your retirement years, and the federal government wants to make sure you use the money for that purpose. If you receive a distribution from your traditional IRA before you reach the age of 59½, the IRS considers this a premature distribution. Like all distributions from traditional IRAs, premature distributions are generally taxable. You will pay federal (and possibly state) income tax on the portion of the distribution that represents tax-deductible contributions, any pre-tax funds that were rolled over into the IRA from an employer-sponsored retirement plan, and investment earnings. In addition to regular income tax, distributions taken prior to age 59½ may be subject to a 10 percent federal premature distribution penalty tax (and possibly a state penalty) on the taxable portion of the distribution.

The penalty tax is meant to encourage you to leave your money in the IRA until age 59½ or later. This reduces the risk that you will deplete your funds prematurely and run out of money at some point in retirement. The assumption is that by the time you reach age 59½, you are either already retired or near retirement, and can safely begin using your retirement money.

Income taxes on IRA and retirement plan distributions can really add up. When a distribution is also subject to the 10 percent federal penalty, the portion of the distribution that goes into your pocket obviously dwindles even further. If you are close to age 59½ and wish to take a distribution from your traditional IRA, check the calendar carefully to avoid a potentially costly mistake.


Exceptions to the premature distribution tax, including SEPPs


Unless you qualify for an exception, taxable amounts you withdraw from a traditional IRA before age 59½ are subject to a federal 10 percent premature distribution tax (and possibly a state penalty tax, too). This premature distribution tax is assessed in addition to any federal (and possibly state) income tax due. Fortunately, Section 72(t) of the Internal Revenue Code lists several exceptions. For example, the penalty doesn't apply if you have a qualifying disability, or if you use the proceeds to pay certain unreimbursed medical expenses.

However, one of the most important exceptions, from a retirement income perspective, involves taking a series of "substantially equal periodic payments" (SEPPS) from your IRA. This exception is important because it's available to anyone, regardless of age, and the funds can be used for any purpose.

SEPPs are payments that are calculated to exhaust the funds in your IRA (or combination of IRAs) over your life (or life expectancy), or over the joint lives (or joint life expectancy) of you and your beneficiary. To meet the SEPPs exception, you must use an IRS-approved distribution method, and take at least one distribution annually. There are three IRS-approved methods for calculating SEPPs, each of which requires that you select a life expectancy or mortality table, and two of which require that you select a reasonable interest rate.

Technical Note:         The three IRS-approved methods for determining annual payments that qualify as substantially equal periodic payments are the RMD method, the fixed amortization method, and the fixed annuitization method. The rules for calculating your SEPPs can be found in IRS Notice 89-25 and Revenue Ruling 2002-62.

If you have more than one IRA, you're not required to aggregate all of them in order to take advantage of the SEPPs exception. You can consider the account balance of only one of your IRAs, or you can elect to aggregate the account balances of two or more of your IRAs. But you can't use only a portion of an IRA to calculate your SEPPs. Because you're not required to aggregate all of your IRAs, you can use tax-free rollovers to ensure that the IRA that will be the source of your periodic payments contains the exact amount necessary to generate the specific payment amount you want. This makes the SEPPs exception a very important and flexible retirement income planning tool.

Even though your payments must be calculated as though they will be paid over your lifetime (or over your and your beneficiary's lifetimes), you don't actually have to take distributions for that long. You can change, or stop, your SEPPs after payments from your IRA have been made for at least five years, or after you reach age 59½, whichever is later. If you modify or stop the payments before then, you'll generally be subject to the 10 percent premature distribution tax on the taxable part of all payments you received before you reached age 59½ (unless the modification was due to death or disability). In addition, interest may be imposed.

Tip:     The five-year period begins on the date of the first withdrawal, so no modification can be made before the fifth anniversary of that withdrawal. This is true even if you turn age 59½ before the fifth anniversary of that withdrawal.

Example(s):   Assume John began taking annual distributions from his traditional IRA account three years ago, when he was 43 years old. (John has taken these distributions according to an IRS-approved method.) John does not take a distribution this year. Because John's payment stream has been "modified," the 10 percent penalty will now apply retroactively to all of his previous distributions, and interest may also be imposed. (A state tax penalty may apply, as well.)

Assume that John began taking annual distributions from his traditional IRA on October 1, 2011, when he was 57½ years old. He also took the correct annual distributions in 2012, 2013, and 2014 (when he was age 60). Even though he was over age 59½ on October 1, 2014, he must take one more required distribution by October 1, 2015. Otherwise, he'll be subject to the 10 percent penalty on the taxable portion of the distributions he took when he was under age 59½.

Caution:         To ensure that your distributions will qualify for the SEPPs exception to the premature distribution tax, get professional advice. The calculation of SEPPs can be complicated, and the tax penalties involved in the event of an error can be significant.


Should you take distributions from your traditional IRA before age 59½?


You are allowed to take distributions from your traditional IRA whenever you like and in any amount you choose. That does not mean, however, that you should. As a general rule, it is not advisable to take distributions from a traditional IRA before age 59½ (or for that matter, at any age prior to your retirement). First, as illustrated above, the portion of the distribution that goes to the federal government for taxes can be substantial--not to mention state taxes and penalties. This is especially true if the entire distribution is taxable, or if none of the exceptions to the premature distribution tax apply.

In addition, even if all or some of the distribution will not be taxed or penalized, taking IRA distributions before age 59½ may still be unwise. By dipping into your IRA funds at a relatively young age, you run the risk of depleting those funds sooner than you had anticipated. This could jeopardize your retirement goals and financial security later in life. Funds removed from an IRA may also be missing out on several years or more of potential tax-deferred growth, depending on investment performance.

However, the decision of whether to tap into your IRA nest egg ultimately depends on your individual circumstances. Perhaps you have urgent expenses, and withdrawing from your IRA is the only way you can pay them. It is also possible that you have accumulated large balances in your IRAs and other retirement accounts, so that withdrawing from your IRAs now will not pose a risk to your future financial security. In these cases, taking distributions before age 59½ is not necessarily ill-advised. Whatever your situation, though, you should consult a tax professional before taking a distribution.


Distributions from Traditional IRAs: Between Ages 59½ and 70½


Once you reach the age of 59½, you are allowed (but not required) to take distributions from your traditional IRA without being subject to the 10 percent premature distribution tax. You may choose to take distributions sporadically, as you need the money, or you may request an automatic distribution from your account according to a prearranged schedule you establish with your IRA administrator.


Should you withdraw money from your IRA between ages 59½ and 70½?


It depends on your circumstances. If you really need the money for income or unforeseen expenses, you might consider drawing on your IRA. However, if you have other sources of income and don't need the IRA funds, you may want to think twice about withdrawing funds. Even though you will be free of the premature distribution tax once you've reached age 59½, you still may have to pay income taxes on all or part of any IRA withdrawals (depending on whether or not the contributions you made were tax deductible). If the amount of a taxable distribution is substantial, it may even push you into a higher tax bracket for that year. This could increase your annual tax liability significantly.

In addition, if you take a number of large IRA distributions after reaching 59½, your IRA could be depleted (or at least reduced in size) more quickly than you had planned. This could mean a smaller nest egg for your later retirement years when you may need income the most, and a much smaller balance available to leave to your beneficiaries when you die. And, of course, the longer you leave funds in an IRA, the greater the opportunity for compounded, tax-deferred growth of earnings. The point is that it's generally not wise or appropriate to take distributions from an IRA between ages 59½ and 70½.


Distributions from traditional IRAs: After Age 70½



Ideally, you would like to have complete control over the timing of distributions from your traditional IRAs. Then you could leave your funds in your IRAs for as long as you wished, and withdraw the funds only if you really needed them. This would enable you to maximize the funds' tax-deferred growth in the IRA, and minimize your annual income tax liability. Unfortunately, it doesn't work this way. You must take what are known as required minimum distributions from your traditional IRAs.


What are required minimum distributions?



Required minimum distributions (RMDs), sometimes referred to as minimum required distributions (MRDs), are withdrawals that the federal government requires you to take annually from your traditional IRAs after you reach age 70½. You can always withdraw more than the required minimum in any year if you wish, but if you withdraw less than required, you will be subject to a federal penalty tax. RMDs are calculated to dispose of your entire interest in the IRA over a specified period of time. The purpose of this federal rule is to ensure that people use their IRAs to fund their retirement, and not simply as a vehicle of wealth transfer and accumulation.


When must RMDs be taken?

Your first RMD represents your distribution for the year in which you reach age 70½. However, you have some flexibility in terms of when you actually have to take this first-year distribution. You can take it during the year you reach age 70½, or you can delay it until April 1 of the following year. Since your first distribution generally must be taken no later than April 1 following the year you reach age 70½, this date is known as your required beginning date (RBD). Required distributions for subsequent years must be taken no later than December 31 of each calendar year until you die or your balance is reduced to zero. This means that if you opt to delay your first distribution until the following year, you will be required to take two distributions during that year--your first-year required distribution and your second-year required distribution.

Example(s):   You own a traditional IRA. Your 70th birthday is December 2 of year one, so you will reach age 70½ in year two. You can take your first RMD during year two, or you can delay it until April 1 of year three. If you choose to delay your first distribution until year three, you will have to take two required distributions during year three--one for year two and one for year three. That is because your required distribution for year three cannot be delayed until the following year.


Should you delay your first RMD?



Your first decision is when to take your first RMD. Remember, you have the option of delaying your first distribution until April 1 following the calendar year in which you reach age 70½. You might delay taking your first distribution if you expect to be in a lower income tax bracket in the following year, perhaps because you'll no longer be working or will have less income from other sources. However, if you wait until the following year to take your first distribution, your second distribution must be made on or by December 31 of that same year.

Receiving your first and second RMDs in the same year may not be in your best interest. Since this "double" distribution will increase your taxable income for the year, it may cause you to pay more in federal and state income taxes. It could even push you into a higher federal income tax bracket for the year. In addition, the increased income may cause you to lose the benefit of certain tax exemptions and deductions that might otherwise be available to you. So the decision of whether or not to delay your first required distribution can be crucial, and should be based on your personal tax situation.

Example(s):   You are unmarried and reached age 70½ in 2014. You had taxable income of $25,000 in 2014 and expect to have $25,000 in taxable income in 2015. You have money in a traditional IRA and determined that your RMD from the IRA for 2014 was $50,000, and that your RMD for 2015 is $50,000 as well. You took your first RMD in 2014. The $50,000 was included in your income for 2014, which increased your taxable income to $75,000. At a marginal tax rate of 25 percent, federal income tax was approximately $14,606 for 2014 (assuming no other variables). In 2015, you take your second RMD. The $50,000 will be included in your income for 2015, increasing your taxable income to $75,000 and resulting in federal income tax of approximately $14,843. Total federal income tax for 2014 and 2015 will be $29,449.

Now suppose you did not take your first RMD in 2014 but waited until 2015. In 2014, your taxable income was $25,000. At a marginal tax rate of 15 percent, your federal income tax was $3,295 for 2014. In 2015, you take both your first RMD ($50,000) and your second RMD ($50,000). These two $50,000 distributions will increase your taxable income in 2015 to $125,000, taxable at a marginal rate of 28 percent, resulting in federal income tax of approximately $28,071. Total federal income tax for 2014 and 2015 will be $31,336--almost $1,887 more than if you had taken your first RMD in 2014.


How are RMDs calculated?



RMDs are calculated by dividing your traditional IRA account balance each year by the applicable distribution period. Your account balance is calculated as of December 31 of the year preceding the calendar year for which the distribution is required to be made. The applicable distribution period is generally the life expectancy factor for your age set out in the Uniform Lifetime Table published by the IRS. (If your beneficiary is your spouse, and he or she is more than 10 years younger than you, the applicable distribution period is determined using a joint and last survivor table published by the IRS.)

Caution:         When calculating the RMD amount for your second distribution year, you base the calculation on your account balance in the IRA as of December 31 of the first distribution year (the year you reached age 70½), regardless of whether or not you waited until April 1 of the following year to take your first required distribution.

Example(s):   You have a traditional IRA. Your 70th birthday is November 1 of year one, and you therefore reach age 70½ in year two. Because you turn 70½ in year two, you must take an RMD for year two from your IRA. This distribution (your first RMD) must be taken no later than April 1 of year three. In calculating this RMD, you must use the total value of your IRA as of December 31 of year one.

If you have more than one traditional IRA, a required distribution is calculated separately for each IRA. These amounts are then added together to determine your RMD for the year. You can withdraw your RMD from any one or more of your IRAs. (Your traditional IRA trustee or custodian must tell you how much you're required to take out each year, or offer to calculate it for you.)

Caution:         Special rules apply if you have annuitized one or more of your IRAs.


What if you fail to take RMDs as required?



If you fail to take at least your RMD amount for any year (or if you take it too late), you will be subject to a federal penalty tax. The penalty tax is a 50 percent excise tax on the amount by which the RMD exceeds distributions actually made to you during the taxable year. You report and pay the 50 percent tax on your federal income tax return for the calendar year in which the distribution shortfall occurs.

Example(s):   You own a single traditional IRA and compute your RMD for year one to be $7,000. You take only $2,000 as a year-one distribution from the IRA by the date required. Since you are required to take at least $7,000 as a distribution but have taken only $2,000, your RMD exceeds the amount of your actual distribution by $5,000 ($7,000 - $2,000). You are therefore subject to an excise tax of $2,500 (50 percent of $5,000), reportable and payable on your year-one tax return.


Distributions from Roth IRAs



Qualified distributions are completely tax free


You are free to make withdrawals at any time from your Roth IRA, but only qualified distributions receive tax-free treatment. A qualified distribution is not subject to federal income tax or a 10 percent premature distribution tax. A withdrawal from a Roth IRA (including both your contributions and investment earnings) is qualified if: (1) it is made at least five years after you first establish any Roth IRA, and (2) any one of the following also applies:

·         You have reached age 59½ by the time of the withdrawal
·         The withdrawal is made due to a qualifying disability
·         The withdrawal is made for first-time homebuyer expenses ($10,000 lifetime limit)
·         The withdrawal is made by your beneficiary or estate after your death

Tip:     The five-year holding period begins on January 1 of the tax year for which you make your first regular contribution to any Roth IRA or, if earlier, January 1 of the tax year in which you make your first rollover contribution to any Roth IRA.

Tip:     Because the five-year holding period runs from the first day of the plan year in which you establish any Roth IRA, you should establish one as soon as you can, even if you can afford only a minimal contribution. The earlier you satisfy the five-year holding period, the sooner you may be able to receive tax-free qualified distributions from your Roth IRA.


Nonqualified withdrawals


Even if you make a withdrawal that fails to meet the requirements for a qualified distribution, your Roth IRA withdrawal enjoys special tax treatment. When you withdraw funds from your Roth IRA, distributions are treated as consisting of your contributions first and investment earnings last. Since amounts that represent your contributions have already been taxed, they are not taxed again or penalized (even if you are under age 59½) when you withdraw them. Only the portion of a nonqualified distribution that represents investment earnings will be taxed and possibly penalized. All of your Roth IRAs are aggregated when determining the taxable portion of your nonqualified distribution.

Example(s):   In 2013, you establish your first Roth IRA and contribute $5,000 in after-tax dollars. You make no further contribution to the Roth IRA. In 2015 your Roth IRA has grown to $5,300. You withdraw the entire $5,300. Because you withdrew the funds within five tax years, your withdrawal does not meet the requirements for a qualified distribution. You already paid tax on the $5,000 you contributed, so that portion of your withdrawal is not taxed or penalized. However, the $300 that represents investment earnings is subject to tax and the 10 percent premature distribution tax, unless an exception applies.

Tip:     Distributions from Roth IRAs are generally treated as being made from contributions first and earnings last (see ordering rules below). In the previous example, if you withdrew only $5,000 (leaving $300), the withdrawal would be tax free (and penalty free) since the entire amount would be considered a return of your contributions.

Technical Note:         Technically, a distribution from a Roth IRA that is not a qualified distribution and is not rolled over to another Roth IRA is included in your gross income to the extent that the distribution, when added to the amount of any prior distributions (qualified or nonqualified) from any of your Roth IRAs, and reduced by the amount of those prior distributions that were previously included in your gross income, exceeds your contributions to all your Roth IRAs. For this purpose any amount distributed to you as a corrective distribution is treated as if it was never contributed.


Your funds can stay in a Roth IRA longer than in a traditional IRA


The IRS requires you to take annual RMDs from traditional IRAs beginning at age 70½. These withdrawals are calculated to dispose of all of the money in the traditional IRA over a given period of time. However, Roth IRAs are not subject to the RMD rules. In fact, you are not required to take a single distribution from a Roth IRA during your life (although distributions are generally required after your death). This can be a significant advantage in terms of your estate planning.


Special penalty provisions may apply to withdrawals of Roth IRA funds that were converted from a traditional IRA


If you rolled over or converted funds from a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA, special rules apply. If you are under age 59½, any nonqualified withdrawal that you make from the Roth IRA within five years of the rollover or conversion may be subject to the 10 percent premature distribution tax (to the extent that the withdrawal consists of converted funds that were taxed at the time of conversion). The reason for this special rule is to ensure that taxpayers don't convert funds from a traditional IRA solely to avoid the early distribution penalty.

Tip:     The five-year holding period begins on January 1 of the tax year in which you convert the funds from the traditional IRA to the Roth IRA. When applying this special rule, a separate five-year holding period applies each time you convert funds from a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA.

Caution:         This five-year period may not be the same as the five-year period used to determine whether your withdrawal is a qualified distribution.

Example(s):   In 2012, you opened your first Roth IRA account by converting a $10,000 traditional IRA to a Roth IRA. You included $10,000 in your taxable income for 2012. You made no further contributions. In 2015, at age 55, your Roth IRA is worth $12,000, and you withdraw $10,000. The distribution is not a qualified distribution because five years have not elapsed from the date you first established a Roth IRA. And because you are making a nonqualified withdrawal within five years of your conversion, the entire $10,000 is subject to a 10 percent premature distribution tax, unless you qualify for an exception. This "recaptures" the early distribution tax you would have paid at the time of the conversion.

You opened a regular Roth IRA account in 2008 with a contribution of $100, and made no further contributions to the account. In 2012, at age 60, you converted a $100,000 traditional IRA to a Roth IRA. In 2015, you withdraw $50,000 from this Roth IRA. Because you are over age 59½ in 2015, and because more than five years have elapsed from January 1, 2008 (the year you first established any Roth IRA), your withdrawal is a qualified distribution and is totally free of federal income taxes. Even though your withdrawal was within five years of the conversion, no penalty tax applies.


Which assets should you draw from first?


You may have assets in accounts that are taxable (e.g., CDs, mutual funds), tax deferred (e.g., traditional IRAs and 401(k)s), and tax free (e.g., Roth IRAs and Roth 401(k)s). Given a choice, which type of account should you withdraw from first? The answer is--it depends.

For retirees who don't care about leaving an estate to beneficiaries, the answer is simple in theory: withdraw money from taxable accounts first, then tax-deferred accounts, and lastly, tax-free accounts. By using your tax-favored accounts last, and avoiding taxes as long as possible, you'll keep more of your retirement dollars working for you.

For retirees who intend to leave assets to beneficiaries, the analysis is more complicated. You need to coordinate your retirement planning with your estate plan. For example, if you have appreciated or rapidly-appreciating assets, it may be more advantageous for you to withdraw from tax-deferred and tax-free accounts first. This is because these accounts will not receive a step up in basis at your death.

However, this may not always be the best strategy. For example, if you intend to leave your entire estate to your spouse, it may make sense to withdraw from taxable accounts first. This is because spouses are given preferential tax treatment with regard to retirement plans. A surviving spouse can roll over retirement plan funds to his or her own IRA or retirement plan, or, in some cases, may continue the deceased spouse's plan as his or her own. The funds in the plan continue to grow tax deferred, and distributions need not begin until the spouse's own required beginning date.

Another factor to consider is that IRA assets enjoy special protection from creditors under federal and most state laws. Federal law provides protection for up to $1,245,475 (as of April 1, 2013) (and in some cases more) of your aggregate Roth and traditional IRA assets if you declare bankruptcy. (Amounts rolled over to the IRA from an employer qualified plan or 403(b) plan, plus any earnings on the rollover, aren't subject to this dollar cap and are fully protected.) The laws of your particular state may provide additional bankruptcy protection, and may provide protection from the claims of your creditors even in cases outside of bankruptcy. You should check with an attorney to find out how your state treats IRAs. If asset protection is important to you, this could impact the order in which you take distributions from your various retirement and taxable accounts.

The bottom line is that this decision is a complicated one. A financial professional can help you determine the best course based on your individual circumstances.

Jared Daniel may be reached at www.WealthGuardianGroup.com or our Facebook page.


IMPORTANT DISCLOSURESBroadridge Investor Communication Solutions, Inc. does not provide investment, tax, or legal advice. The information presented here is not specific to any individual's personal circumstances.To the extent that this material concerns tax matters, it is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed by law.  Each taxpayer should seek independent advice from a tax professional based on his or her individual circumstances.These materials are provided for general information and educational purposes based upon publicly available information from sources believed to be reliable—we cannot assure the accuracy or completeness of these materials.  The information in these materials may change at any time and without notice.